A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46
Interview: April 28th - May 8th
668 women were interviewed including 153 subject to hazards of heat and burning, 299 to oil, grease and fats, and 208 to acids and corrosive substances.
I. TYPE OF HEADGEAR WORN AND TYPE CONSIDERED BEST FOR WORK
Below are given proportion of women in the three hazard groups naming different types of headgear as best for their work and types actually worn at time of interview.
More than half the women interviewed wore nothing on their heads for work. There are no marked differences between types worn and types preferred. The proportions of women who preferred or wore turbans are significantly higher than those who wore nets or peaked caps and caps without peaks were second in popularity.
Significantly, smaller proportions of women in the acid and corrosive hazard group than those working with oil, grease and fats were any kind of headgear.
Numbers of women wearing various types of headgear in the three hazard groups are too small to justify comparison of the preferences of older and new workers: but total figures for all three groups show that a significantly higher proportion of women who had been in their jobs over 2 years preferred net caps than did newer workers.
Up to 2 years | Over 2 years | |
% | % | |
Cap with peak | 23 | 15 |
Cap without peak | 27 | 20 |
Turban | 36 | 36 |
Net | 13 ± 4.6 | 29 ± 9.4 |
SAMPLE | 213 | 93 |
Tables showing comparisons of (1) type preferred by type worn and (2) type preferred by alternative, are not included because in all cases the numbers of women who had given preferences were too small.
II REASONS FOR PREFERENCES
Reasons for preferences are given below in the case of turbans and caps without peaks. (see table on Page 2)
Sample analysed by Area and Hazard Group
The only significant differences between the distribution of workers in the three hazard groups is that there was a smaller proportion of workers in oil, grease and fats interviewed in the London area than in the South, South-East and E. Anglia area, and a smaller proportion of acid corrosive workers interviewed in this latter area than in London.
It may be seen from the table above that the percentage of workers in London who considered a peaked cap best for their work is significantly lower than in all other regions except Scotland. In this latter area the proportion of women not wearing any type of headgear for work is significantly higher than in the four other areas.
Analysis by Five areas of Questions
5. Where do you get the type of headgear you consider best for your work?
6. Have you tried to buy any headgear since Christmas?
7. If yes: was there any difficulty?
Of the 10 women who had had difficulty in buying headwear, 1 said that this was because it was unobtainable.
Below is given a table showing sources from which four types of headwear were usually obtained.
Cap with peak | Cap without peak | Turban | Net | Total | |
Dept.store or large shop | 8 | 19 | 27 | 20 | 24 |
Small local shop | 4 | 10 | 28 | 10 | 17 |
Employer | 44 | 61 | 23 | 17 | 44 |
No information | 7 | 11 | 22 | 7 | 15 |
SAMPLE | 63 | 101 | 110 | 54 | 311 |
Comparison of (1) preferred and type worn and (2) Type preferred and suggested alternative , in three hazard groups.
TYPES PREFERRED
(Note. Vertical totals under “Types worn" add to more than horizontal totals of “Perferences given” because in some cases women mentioned two types of headgear, either of which they usually wore for work)