A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46

1 2 3 4

WARTIME SOCIAL SURVEY
WORKING CLOTHES
New Series Regional I.2

Men’s Shirts

I TYPE WORN AND TYPE BEST FOR WORK

Heat and burning Oil, grease and fats Acids and corrosives Agriculture Total
Type Worn Best Type Type Worn Best Type Type Worn Best Type Type Worn Best Type Best Type Type Worn
% % % % % % % % %
Cotton, drill 44 38 53 46 57 51 60 57 49 53
Gambrune - - - - - - - - - -
Poplin 9 5 13 9 10 4 3 2 4 7
Twill 18 20 16 20 18 18 11 11 16 15
Tweed 2 2 1 - - - 1 - 1 1
Flannel 15 20 8 9 8 9 12 16 14 12
Flannelette 6 4 3 3 7 5 9 7 5 7
Wincyette 2 1 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 2
Welsh flannel 2 4 1 - - - 1 - 1 1
Union - - - - 2 2 1 1 1 1
Not worn 4 3 3 2 1 1 1 5 5 2
No information 1 3 3 7 1 9 1 5 1 1
SAMPLE 293 293 192 192 233 233 482 482 1200 1200

Half those interviewed preferred cotton or drill shirts, the proportions being slightly lower in the heat and burning group and slightly higher among agricultural workers.

There are no considerable discrepancies between the proportions wearing and preferring the different types of shirts in the four hazard groups.

(Note. The following information was collected by investigators working on this inquiry. “Acid workers say there is no substitute for Welsh flannel.” “Workers in the North of England use and prize Union flannel”. Agricultural workers in some parts said that khaki drill shirts don’t absorb sweat and that ordinary cotton or “Oxford” shirts are best for this purpose.)

The numbers who had been in their jobs less than two years are insufficient to give breakdowns by old and new workers.

Breakdowns of type worn by types preferred in the different hazard groups are given only in the case of those preferring cotton shirts, as the numbers preferring other types are insufficient to give statistically reliable results.

Heat and Burning

Best Types Type Worn
Cotton, drill Cotton Poplin Twill Flannel Others Sample
% % % % % %
96 3 5 2 1 109

Acids and Corrosives

Best Types Type Worn
Cotton, drill Cotton Twill Others No information Sample
% % % % %
97 7 10 - 118

Agriculture

Best Type Type Worn
Cotton, drill Cotton Twill Others
% % %
98 - 3

In the case of the oil, grease and fats group, almost all of those who preferred cotton shirts were wearing them.

II ALTERNATIVE TYPES

Workers were asked to say what sort of shirt would do as an alternative to best type. Numbers of men in the oil, grease and fats hazard group who gave preferences are too small to justify inclusion.

Heat and Burning

Best Types Alternative Type
Cotton, drill Cotton Twill Flannel Others Flannel No Information Sample
% % % % % % %
(39) 19 6 4 14 28 109

Acids and Corrosives

Best Types Alternative Type
Cotton, drill Cotton Twill Flannel Others Flannel No Information Sample
% % % % % % %
(35) 19 - - 19 31 118

Agriculture

Best Types Alternative Type
Cotton, drill Twill Others Flannel No Information Sample
% % % % %
(41) 21 16 26 277

III REASONS FOR PREFERENCE

These were as follows: Cotton Drill % Twill % Flannel %
Hardwearing, strong, serviceable 50 20 20
Wash well 9 11 2
Cool 19 7 1
Warm, protect from chills, rheumatism 2 1 36
Don’t show the dirt 6 5 1
Absorb sweat 2 - 38
Best for this work 2 3 1
Used to them. Always had them 8 3 1
No information 11 9 3
SAMPLE 613 203 174

(Percentages add to more than 100 because more than one reason was often given)

Cotton and twill are preferred largely because they are durable, flannel because it absorbs sweat and is warm.

IV ANALYSIS BY REGION

The proportions in the different hazard groups were distributed as follows:

London South, S.W. & E. Anglia Midlands & Wales NorthernEngland Scotland Total
% % % % % %
Heat and burning 28 19 31 22 24 24
Oil, grease and fats 38 14 13 14 17 16
Acids and corrosives 34 9 24 28 20 20
Agriculture - 58 32 44 39 40
SAMPLE 134 350 312 324 130 1250

Regional figures showing the types preferred should be considered in conjunction with the analysis given above, as the proportions in different hazard groups in the five areas are different. Also the numbers in London and Scotland are very small. (See Analysis by Areas and Hazard Group in Men’s Footwear report, p.12).

Best Type South, S.W. London & E.Anglia Midlands & Wales NorthernEngland Scotland Total
% % % % % %
Cotton, drill 26 63 42 58 25 49
Gambrune 1 - -
Poplin 3 1 14 1 4
Twill 30 16 16 3 35 16
Tweed 1 - - - 4 1
Flannel 8 10 14 17 22 14
Flannelette 5 5 3 7 10 5
Wincyette 5 2 1 1 - 1
Welsh flannel - - 4 1 - 1
Union - - - 3 - 1
Not worn 12 1 - 1 - 2
No information 9 2 6 8 5 6
SAMPLE 135 354 316 326 130 1261

V WHERE SHIRTS WERE OBTAINED

Men obtained their shirts from different sources in the following proportions

%
Large local shop 59
Small local shop 31
Employer 1
Mail order 1
Secondhand 1
No information 7
SAMPLE 1155

Cotton, twill and flannel shirts were obtained from different sources in the following proportions:

Cotton,drill Twill Flannel
% % %
Large local shop 56 73 48
Small local shop 34 21 35
Employer 1 - 2
Mail order 1 1
Secondhand 1 1 1
No information 7 4 7
SAMPLE 613 203 174

Breakdown by region is as follows:

London South, S.W. & E. Anglia Midlands & Wales Northern England Scotland Total
% % % % % %
Large local shop 43 53 61 59 82 59
Small local shop 47 40 26 28 15 31
Employer 1 - 1 2 - 1
Mail order 1 1 - - - 1
Secondhand 4 1 1 1 1 1
No information 4 5 11 10 2 7
SAMPLE 106 340 292 294 123 1155

VI EXTENT TO WHICH MEN HAD TRIED TO BUY SHIRTS SINCE CHRISTMAS

%
Had tried to buy 33
Had not tried to buy 64
No information 3
SAMPLE 115

17% of those who tried had difficulty. Numbers are too small to give results for subsequent questions.

Women’s Footwear

An inquiry made for the Board of Trade by Wartime Social Survey. Field work was in progress from April 29th to May 11th 1943.

Sample Analysed by Hazard Group and Length of Time in Job

Up to 2 yrs. Over 2 yrs. Unclass Sample
% % % % %
Heat and burning 1 108 69 45 29 4 2 157
Oil, grease and fats 2 189 63 110 36 3 1 302
Acids and corrosives 3 118 56 90 43 1 1 209
TOTAL 415 62 245 37 8 1 668

It has not been possible to obtain thoroughly accurate information as to whether the numbers of workers interviewed in each hazard group in the five different areas as strictly representative of the proportions actually working with these hazards in each area. The sample was, however, planned on the basis of all available information of this nature.

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & Cookie Policy Accept & Close