A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46

WARTIME SOCIAL SURVEY

REPORT 1. (NEW SERIES).

Investigation into Retailers’ Difficulties

Interviewing was carried out between the 18th and 30th of August. A total of 988 alls was made.

An account of the sampling method and the distribution of interviews is given in Appendix A, and the Tables in that Appendix. It will be seen that weighting has been carried out on the basis of the population covered. Reception was friendly, and only 2 refusals were recorded. No mention of the Board of Trade was made.

Three main problems were investigated:-

  1. A. Coupons and Supply .

  2. B. The New Clothing Cards .

  3. C. The Extent to which Loose Coupons are offered .

1. 2. 3.

COUPONS AND SUPPLIES

It will be seen that the answers given in reply to the first question fall into generalised categories.

Two further points must be made:

  1. (a) Not all replies had the same shade of meaning since some (a few) retailers were resentful of the quota scheme, and their replies were influenced by this resentment.

  2. (b) There are included replies from certain retailers, mainly female ones who buy personally from warehouses. Such people tend to buy what goods are available and do not know their precise needs in advance of stocking up; they are therefore less conscious of shortages.

Question No. 1: “When you present coupons to your wholesalers are they able or unable to give you goods in return?”

TABLE II.
Code Answer Calls 262 152 131 100 100 60 51 42 40 30 20 988
Glasgow Liverpool Sheffield Wandsworth Nottingham Wolverhampton. Norwich Paisley Warrington Torquay Taunton Weighted Average
A % A % A % A % A % A % A % A % A % A % A % %
1 Head Office buys 11 4.3 6 3.9 21 16.0 42 42 1 1 - - 12 24 6 14.3 1 2.5 2 6.7 3 15 8.9
2 Generally able, no difficulty 180 68.7 77 50.7 63 48.0 39 39 68 68 56 93.3 25 50 14 33.3 17 42.5 21 70.0 9 45 58.3
3 Difficulty on some lines; can never get some goods 25 9.5 39 25.7 34 25.9 14 14 7 7 2 3.3 12 24 16 38.1 15 37.5 - - 5 25 17.4
4 Some difficulty in all lines; can never get all goods 28 10.7 23 15.1 12 9.3 2 2 - - 2 3.4 1 2 6 14.3 2 5.0 4 13.3 1 5 9.4
5 Coupons not sent till goods available 14 5.3 6 3.9 - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - 1 2.5 3 10.0 - - 2.9
6 Substitute goods sent -- - - - - - 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 0.1
7 Can get only cheap goods - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 2.5 - - - - .05
8 Have not tried yet 4 1.5 1 .7 - - - - 22 22 - - - - - - - - - - - - 2.4
9 Other Statements -- - - - - - - - 2 2 - - - - - - - - - - 1 5 .2
10 Not answered -- - - - 1 .8 1 1 - - - - - - - - 3 7.5 - - - - .3
262 100% 152 100% 131 100% 100 100% 100 100% 60 100% 50 100% 42 100% 40 100% 30 100% 20 100% 99.95%

Code No.2 . Generally able, no difficulty” was given in 56.3% of all cases. Included here are some 227 (23% of all oases) retailers who stated that they had no difficulty with any line. The replies here yield no correlation either on the size of town, region or air raid experience; e.g. Wolverhampton, with the largest number is the sixth largest town. The returns for Glasgow and Paisley differ widely (68.7% and 33.3% respectively).

Replies in Codes 3 and 4 also varied widely, and it is difficult to suggest reasons for the variations.

Results yielded in Code 4 may be compared with Code 13 in Question 2 (See Table III), where the same answer is given in reply to a more precise question by 44 retailers (i.e. l% only of all cases). The only other notable item in this Table is the large number of Nottingham retailers, 22 (or 22%) who had not tried to obtain goods for coupons.

Comments made by many retailers to Investigators indicated a feeling that the retention of the Quota System alongside the Coupon Ration Scheme led to confusion and difficulties.

Question No. 2 .

“For what lines do you usually have to wait?”

This question was coded under 14 main heading with sub-divisions of the main groups of Men's, Women's, and Children's Clothing.

The main results are given in the Summary Table below. It should be noted that the returns given are numbers of mentions of item coded, and not number of retailers.

SUMMARY OF TABLE III.
Town All Men's All Women's All Children's Infants
% % % %
Glasgow 81 21.6 150 39.9 45 11.8 7 .3
Liverpool 71 25.5 104 38.3 49 16.9 6 2.1
Sheffield 17 12.1 52 33.1 11 6.9 2 1.3
Wandsworth 18 20.9 21 24.4 9 10.6 2 2.3
Nottingham 33 18.3 71 39.4 17 11.8 - -
Wolverhampton 42 30.8 55 40.7 22 16.3 2 1.5
Norwich 12 16.5 27 23.6 12 16.5 3 4.1
Paisley 9 14.9 24 39 10 16.8 - -
Warrington 18 18.2 46 47 22 59.2 2 2
Torquay 4 11.2 8 22.4 3 8.4 3 8.4
Tamton 11 33.6 12 37.9 - - - -
TOTALS 316 21 570 37.7 198 12.3 27 1.8

It will be seen that in all areas difficulties in obtaining Women's clothing are mentioned more often than difficulties in obtaining men's or children’ clothes.

The items Women's Hosiery, Underwear and Corsets are these occurring most often. In the case of Women's Hosiery, this is mentioned in 27.1% of all Paisley replies; but in only 1 and 2 cases respectively, in Torquay and Taunton.

The only other items to receive a large number of mentions are Men's Hosiery and Underwear (70 and 69). Heavy Woollen material, Shirts, Trousers, Dresses and Children's Knitwear all receive over 40 mentions.

Question 2: “For what lines do you usually have to wait?”

TABLE III.
Code Answer Glasgow Liverpool Sheffield Wandsworth Nottingham Wolverhampton Norwich Paisley Warrington Torquay Taunton Total
% % % % % % % % % % % %
1 Raincoate 2 .5 2 .7 1 .6 1 1.2 2 1.2 1 .7 1 1.4 . 5 5. . 1 3.2 16 1.1
2 Blackout 1 .3 2 .7 2 1.3 1 1.2 3 1.7 . . . . 3 8.4 1 3.2 13 .9
3 Heavy woolen piece goods 4 1. 10 3.6 11 7. 1 1.2 5 2.8 3 2.2 1 1.4 1 1.7 1 1. 3 8.4 . 40 2.6
4 Cotton materials 1 .3 4 1.4 5 3.2 4 4.6 4 2.2 1 .7 . 1 1.7 . . 1 3.2 21 1.4
5 Household goods 4 1. 5 1.8 7 4.5 1 1.2 1 .5 1 .7 1 1.4 . . . . 20 1.3
6 Kitting wools 1 .3 1 .4 3 1.9 . . . 2 2.7 . . . 1 3.2 8 .5
7 Men's clothing in general 1 .3 . . 1 1.2 . . . . . . . 2 .1
A Suits 5 1.3 1 .4 1 .6 2 2.3 4 2.2 1 .7 . . 1 1. . . 15 1.
B Overcoats 1 .3 4 1.4 1 .6 . . 2 1.5 . . . 1 2.8 1 3.2 10 .7
C Shirts 9 2.4 12 4.3 2 1.3 1 1.2 9 5 5 3.7 1 1.4 2 3.3 1 1. . 1 3.2 43 2.8
D Nightwear . . . . . . 1 1.4 . . . . 1 .1
E Overalls 7 1.9 3 1.1 1 .6 . . . . 2 3.3 2 2. . . 15 1.
F Hosiery 18 4.8 19 6.8 . 2 2.3 5 2.8 14 10.2 4 5.5 2 3.3 6 6.2 . . 70 4.6
G Underwear 15 4.0 14 5. 5 3.2 5 5.0 6 3.3 9 6.6 3 4.1 2 3.3 5 5. 1 2.8 4 13. 69 4.6
H Others 17 4.5 8 2.9 4 2.6 2 2.3 4 2.2 5 3.7 2 2.7 . 1 1. 1 2.8 4 13. 48 5.2
I Trousers 2 .5 5 1.8 1 .6 4 4.6 4 2.2 3 2.2 . . 1 1. 1 2.8 1 3.2 22 1.5
K K Cellars 5 1.3 4 1.4 2 2.6 1 1.2 . 3 2.2 . . 1 1. . . . 16 1.1
L I Protective Clothing 1 .3 1 .4 . . 1 .6 . 1 1.4 1 1.7 . . . . 5 .3
8 Women's clothing in general . . . . . . . . . . . .
A Suits 1 .3 1 .4 1 .6 . 7 3.8 6 4.4 . . 1 1. . . 17 1.1
B Overcoats 3 .8 5 1.8 4 2.6 1 1.2 5 2.8 6 4.4 1 1.4 . 1 1. 1 2.8 . 27 2.8
C Dresses 5 1.3 4 1.4 1 .6 3 3.5 10 5.6 10 7.5 1 1.4 . 3 3.1 1 2.8 2 6.5 40 2.6
D Nightwear . . 2 1.3 . . . . . . . . 2 .1
E Knitwear 6 1.6 5 1.8 1 .6 2 2.3 . 1 .7 4 5.5 2 3.2 8 8.2 1 2.8 2 6.5 32 2.1
F Hosiery 83 22.1 44 15.7 15 9.6 5 5.8 23 12.9 13 9.6 11 15.5 17 27.4 18 18.4 1 2.8 2 6.5 232 15.4
G Underwear 20 5.3 13 4.6 16 10.2 4 4.6 7 3.8 9 6.7 4 5.5 2 3.3 8 8.2 . 3 9.7 86 5.7
H Corests 15 4. 14 5. 6 3.8 5 5.8 15 8.4 5 3.7 4 5.5 1 1.7 6 6.1 3 8.4 . 74 4.9
I Overalls – House 4 1. . 1 .6 . . . . . . . . 5 .3
J Overalls – Working 1 .3 . . . . . . . . . . 1 .1
K Woollen materials . 8 2.9 4 2.6 . . 2 1.5 . 1 1.7 . . 2 6.5 17 1.1
L Hats . . . . . . . . . 1 2.8 . 1 .1
M Others 12 3.2 10 3.6 1 .6 1 1.2 4 2.2 3 2.2 2 2.8 . 1 1. . 1 2.2 35 2.3
N Protective Clothing . . . . . . . 1 1.7 . . . . 1 .1
9 Children's Clothing in general 5 1.3 16 5.7 1 .6 . 1 .6 1 .7 2 2.8 5 8.4 2 2. 1 2.8 . . 34 2.3
A Suits 5 1.3 8 2.9 2 1.3 3 3.5 3 1.7 5 3.7 . 1 1.7 . 1 2.8 . 28 1.9
B Overcoats . . 1 .6 1 1.2 . 2 1.5 . 1 1.7 1 1. 1 2.8 . 7 .5
C Nightwear . 2 .7 1 .6 . . . 1 1.4 . 1 1. . . 5 .3
D Knitwear 3 .8 6 2.2 . 1 1.2 . 2 1.5 3 4.1 2 3.3 5 5. . . 22 1.5
F Hosiery 16 4.2 10 3.6 2 1.3 1 1.2 1 .6 7 5.2 2 2.7 1 1.7 8 8.2 . . 48 3.2
G Underwear 10 2.6 1 .4 3 1.9 1 1.2 4 2.2 4 3. 4 5.5 . 4 4.1 . . 31 2.1
H Others 6 1.6 4 1.4 1 .6 2 2.3 8 4.5 1 .7 . . 1 1. . . 23 1.5
10 Infants’ Clothing 7 1.9 6 2.1 2 1.3 2 2.3 . 2 1.5 3 4.1 . 2 2. 3 8.4 . 27 1.8
11 Linings 1 .3 2 .7 3 1.9 1 1.2 . . 1 1.4 . . . . 8 .3
12 Silk goods 2 .5 3 1.1 . 1 1.2 1 .6 . 1 1.4 . . . . 8 .3
13 All lines 8 2.1 16 5.7 4 2.6 3 3.5 5 2.8 . . 6 10. 2 2. . . 44 2.9
14 None 70 18.5 8 2.9 39 24.8 24 27.5 38 21. 9 6.7 12 16.5 9 15. 2 2. 12 33.3 4 13. 227 15.1
TOTAL 377 100.3 281 100.7 157 100.6 87 101. 180 100.3 136 100.3 73 100.7 60 99.2 98 99.5 36 100.5 31 99.3 1516 99.6
4. 5.

The New clothing cards

This section was devised to make preliminary soundings on the reception of the new clothing cards.

Question 3: “Have you had any of the new coupons presented to you yet from the new clothing cards?”

Table IV.
Town Yes No (Number of Retailers) Not answering
% %
Glasgow .... .... 91 9 4
Liverpool .... .... 69 31 3
Sheffield .... .... 72 28 5
Wandsworth .... .... 83 17 -
Nottingham .... .... 52 48 1
Wolverhampton .... 98 2 -
Norwich .... .... 84 16 2
Paisley .... .... 100 - -
Warrington .... .... 90 10 2
Torquay .... .... 67 33 -
Taunton .... .... 80 20 -
Weighted Average 79.2 20.8 Total 17

It will be seen from Table IV that although the general incidence of presentation is higher by nearly 80%, there are marked differences from this in Nottingham (52%), and Paisley (100%).

It must be pointed out that these figures give no indication of the number of new coupons presented nor of the number of persons presenting the new coupons. They indicate only the percentage of retailers in the regions surveyed who have had the cards presented.

Question 4: “Have any of your customers asked you questions about the new coupons yet?”

TABLE V.
Town Customers have asked questions Customers have not asked questions
% %
Glasgow .... ..... ..... 8 92
Liverpool ..... ..... ..... 32 68
Sheffield ..... ..... ..... 12 88
Wandsworth ..... .......... 32 68
Nottingham ..... ..... ..... 26 74
Wolverhampton .... .... 25 75
Norwich ..... ..... ..... 22 78
Paisley ..... ..... ..... 17 83
Warrington ..... ..... ..... 27 73
Torquay ..... ..... ..... 17 83
Taunton ..... ..... ..... 35 65
Weighted Average 19.5 80.5

95 Retailers of the total number visited did not answer Question 4. The Table shows that of the 893 retailers replying about one fifth have had Question 5 put to them.

A comparison of the regional figures in Tables IV, and V Shows that there is no correlation between the incidence of presentation and questioning. Thus Glasgow, with a higher incidence of presentation, has a small percentage of queries. Liverpool, on the other hand, with a smaller than average degree of presentation, leads with Wandsworth in the highest percentage of queries.

The type of questions asked by customers is indicated by the following list:

TABLE VI .

When and where can new cards be obtained?

For how long are old margarine coupons valid?

For how long are the new coupons valid?

Are there special issues of coupons for expectant mothers?

Will margarine coupons in new books be used for clothes?

Can coupons be subdivided to buy goods costing less than 1 coupon?

Retailers indicated that other subjects which caused difficulty were:

“Some people imagine that they require few coupons for a cheap garment.”

“What should the customer do if the old book is lost?”

“Why cannot the ‘X’ coupons be deposited now so that suits can be obtained immediately?”

6.

The Reserved Coupons

An attempt was made to secure an indication of the extent to which the public understood the principle of reserving some of the clothing coupons. Of necessity, this indication was general in nature since retailers were not in a position to give detailed information.

Question 5: “Do your customers in general understand that 20 of these coupons can be used only after January next?”

TABLE VII.

% of Retailers Interviewed

Town Yes Some do not or are doubtful Many do not or are doubtful Not answered
Glasgow 76.2 11.8 1.8 10.2
Liverpool 74.3 19.7 5.3 .7
Sheffield 72.5 2.3 7.6 17.6
Wandsworth 66.0 15.0 4.0 15.0
Nottingham 85.0 8.0 4.0 3.0
Wolverhampton 48.3 20.0 20.0 11.7
Norwich 80.4 3.9 - 15.7
Paisley 85.7 9.5 4.7 -
Warrington 65.0 27.5 5.0 2.5
Torquay 70.0 - 6.6 23.3
Taunton 75.0 5.0 5.0 15.0
Weighted Average 74.0 12.1 4.9 9.0

It will be seen that 74% of all retailers (or 81% of those giving a positive indication) thought that in general their customers understood that some coupons were reserved. A total of 17% of all retailers (or 19% of those giving positive indications) indicated the existence of some doubt on the part of their customers.

Doubt existed most in Liverpool, Wolverhampton and Warrington (which 3 places have more than the average % of retailers notifying questions about the new cards).

7. 8. 9. 10.

The Extent to which Loose Coupons are Offered

It was realised that this Question approached a sphere in which retailers might prove sensitive to enquiry. Two approaches were therefore devised.

The subject was opened by Question 6 in all cases. Where the retailer reacted in such a manner as to suggest that his reply would not be of use the Investigator switched on to the second approach, (Question 10,11 and 12). Where Question 6 was answered normally, and with no suspicion, the Investigator carried on with Question 7,8 and 9.

In only 17 cases was it necessary to switch to the second approach. It may, therefore, be assumed that the bulk of answers to this series of Questions came from co-operative and willing retailers.

Question 6: “when your customers buy rationed goods do they -

In the main bring their books for you to clip?

In the main bring loose coupons?”

TABLE VIII.
Code Glasgow Liverpool Sheffield Wandsworth Nottingham Wolverhampton Norwich Paisley Warrington Torquay Taunton Weighted Average
% % % % % % % % % % % %
1 In the main bring books for retailer to clip 84.4 69.7 77.9 91 94 95 49.0 97.6 60.0 93.4 70 77.5
2 In the main bring loose coupons or sheets .4 6.6 8.4 - 3 - 21.6 2.4 - - - 6.4
3 Some or few bring coupon or sheets 6.5 17.8 11.4 7 3 5.0 21.6 - 35.0 3.3 20 11.2
4 Used to bring coupon, now bring books 7.6 .7 1.5 2 - - - - - - 10 2.9
5 Not answered, Doubtful 1.1 5.2 .8 - - - 7.8 - 5.0 3.3 - 1.9
100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

It will be seen that the only internal inconsistency in the figures appears in the column for Norwich. This area was surveyed by the investigators who worked in Sheffield, and the inconsistency must therefore reflect a difference in the situation in Norwich itself.

An attempt was made to secure more precise information by asking each retailer to estimate the proportion of his customers offering loose coupons, and the results in the Table below should be correlated in those in the preceding Table.

Question 9:“About what percentage bring loose coupons?”

TABLE IX.
Code Reply Glasgow Liverpool Sheffield Wandsworth Wolverhampton Norwich Paisley Warrington Torquay Taunton Nottingham Weighted Average
% % % % % % % % % % % %
1. None 41.2 26.7 49 40 53.4 - 32.6 10 96.7 75 48 39.1
2 Up to 1% 3.0 1.4 .7 20 3.3 - - - - - 6 3.2
3 Unspecified x 33.8 6.6 8.5 6 18.4 13.7 34 7.5 - 5 16 17.7
4 2% - 9% 10.8 18.3 10. 11 15. 9.8 16.3 20. - 5 13 12.8
5 10% - 20% 6.5 7.8 4.6 3 8.4 13.7 4.6 12.5 - - 7 6.5
6 Over 20% 4.6 39.2 27.2 12 1.7 29.2 9.3 50. 3.3 9.15 10 18.9
7 No answer - - - 8 - 33.4 2.3 - - - - 1.8
100.0

x Unspecified indicates an admission of the problem, but unwilling to be tied down to estimates.

It will be seen that in Nottingham, Wolverhampton and Wandsworth the results on Question 9 did not bear out the results on Question 6. A considerable number of retailers acknowledge, in fact, the offering of loose coupons on some scale while their answer to Question 6 appears in principle almost to reject this possibility.

The danger of the position in Liverpool is brought out quite clearly in the answers to Question 9, in fact much more sharply than the generalised answer to Question 6 implies. The Warrington figures confirm this impression and seem to indicate that the conditions in Liverpool exist beyond the immediate area of that city.

Norwich and Taunton were selected for some representation of the country town situation. It will be seem that the results do not indicate any similarity. In Norwich the problems assumed considerable proportions, but this is much less so in Taunton.

The figures for Glasgow and Paisley indicate that the general situation is rather similar, and on the whole are better than the weighted average for the whole sample.

Why are loose coupons offered?

Question 7: “Do you think that in general customers prefer one rather than another - Books, or Loose Coupons?”

TABLE X.
Code Reply Glasgow Liverpool Sheffield Wandsworth Nottingham Wolverhampton Norwich Paisley Warrington Torquay Taunton Weighted Average
% % % % % % % % % % % %
1 In general prefer books 58.8 20.4 20.6 9 86 80 35.2 47.6 25 73.4 65 43.1
2 In general prefer coupons 13.4 57.9 36.6 35 12 5 37.2 14.3 52.5 10. 15. 29.6
3 Some prefer coupon 2.6 .7 .7 1 2 13.3 - 2.4 - - - 2.1
4 A few prefer coupon 1.5 - 1.5 - - 1.7 - - - - - .7
5 No preferences 6.5 4.6 15.3 51 - - 9.8 11.9 - 13.3 15 9.5
6 Cannot state preferences 8.0 9.9 22.8 3 - - 15.9 - 7.3 3.3 5 9.2
7 Like new cards 4.2 3.3 - - - - 1.9 23.8 15. - - 3.1
8 Net answered 5. 3.3 2.3 1 - - - - - - - 2.7
100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

It will be seen that approximately 32% (Cases 2.3 and 4) indicated a preferences on the part of their customers for loess coupons. This is most marked in Liverpool and Warrington. After which areas, Sheffield, Wandsworth and Norwich were somewhat above the weighted average for the sample.

Question 8: “If loose coupons are preferred what is the reason for this?”

TABLE XI.
Code Reply Glasgow Liverpool Sheffield Wandsworth Nottingham Wolverhampton Norwich Paisley Warrington Torquay Taunton Weighted Average Positive Answers
% % % % % % % % % % % % %
1 To avoid carrying ration book 3.1 11.8 2.3 4 6 5.0 - 11.9 2.5 - 10 5.4 12.4
2 Easier shopping saves trouble 5.7 17.7 15.6 1 5 5.0 30 2.4 27.5 - - 10.7 24.5
3 Faciliates pooling of coupons 1.9 15.8 5.3 7 1 3.3 2 7.1 12.5 3.3 - 6.2 14.2
4 Rations books wanted by housekeeper, deposited with retailer 3.1 5.9 16.8 10 - - 14 2.4 7.5 3.3 - 6.5 14.9
5 Grocer had already cut out coupons 4.4 1.3 3.1 2 3 6.7 12 - - - - 3.3 7.6
6 Necessary or easier when children evacuated .4 6.6 - 6 1 - - - - - - 2.0 4.6
7 So that goods may be returned - 2.0 2.3 6 - - 6 2.4 - - - 1.5 3.4
8 For country shopping - - 1.5 1 - - 2 - - - - .4 .9
9 More laxity allowed - .7 .8 1 - - - - - - - .3 .7
10 Miscellaneous 17.9 .7 6.9 3 1 - - - 15 - - 7.3 16.3
11 Not answered 63.7 37.5 45.4 59 83 80 34 73.8 35 93.4 90 56.4

The weighted average for the various codes in this Question have been recalculated on the basis of positive answers to this Question so as to bring out more sharply the relative importance of the various reasons offered.

It will be seen that some 37% of those offering specific reasons mentioned practical convenience (codes 2 and 3). This is most marked In Liverpool, Warrington, Norwich and Sheffield.

Some 22% (codes 4 and 5) of those offering specific reasons mentioned difficulties arising out of the fact that the book was used for other rationed goods. This was most marked in Norwich and Sheffield.

It should be pointed out that both these reasons (codes 2,3,4 and 5) become invalid with the issue of the new clothing cards. If, therefore, the reasons advanced are genuine the issue of the new cards should dispose of nearly 60% of the reasons for preferring loose coupons.

11.

The Distribution of the Sample

The Table below indicates the actual dispersion of calls and sampling factor per thousand shops which this involves.

It should be pointed out that the original proposed sampling factor was uniform for all areas. However, the necessity for securing a stated minimum of calls in all areas, coupled with the impossibility, through air raid destruction, of securing the original quote in some areas, forced some variation.

TABLE I.
Town Calls Cells per 1,000 population
Glasgow 262 1 : 4,000
Liverpool 152 1 : 5,000
Sheffield 131 1 : 4,000
Nottingham 100 1 : 2,800
Wandsworth 100 1 : 2,200
Wolverhampton 60 1 : 2,600
Norwich 51 1 : 2,600
Paisley 42 1 : 2,200
Warrington 40 1 : 2,000
Torquay 30 1 : 2,000
Taunton 20 1 : 2.200
11 areas x 988 1 : 3,400

x Population covered 3,430,000

No reliable estimates of the number of shops in the country, or even in those towns covered, is available. It is therefore not possible to quote a sampling factor for shops. From our Investigators’ reports, however, it was obvious that the sample include a high proportion of the shops dealing in the merchandise covered by the Coupon Schemes. In several cases all the shops in the town dealing with the commodities in question were investigated. The sample in these areas therefore is very nearly a census of the section of the trade concerned.

12. 13.

Analysis of the Sample

A breakdown of the dispersion of the sample between the various types and sizes of shops is made below.

TABLE 1 (a)

Size of Shops

Over 30 x 6 - 30 Under 6 % All cells %
Glasgow 25 55 176 24.2 259 26.2 Glasgow
Liverpool 23 25 106 14.6 154 15.6 Liverpool
Sheffield 10 19 99 13.6 128 13.0 Sheffield
Nottingham 8 18 76 10.4 102 10.3 Nottingham
Wandsworth 6 8 88 12.1 102 10.3 Wandsworth
Wolverhampton 1 12 46 6.3 59 6.0 Wolverhampton
Norwich 7 13 31 4.2 51 5.2 Norwich
Paisley . 10 32 4.6 42 4.2 Paisley
Warrington 3 4 34 4.7 41 4.1 Warrington
Torquay 5 2 23 3.1 30 3.0 Torquay
Taunton 2 1 16 2.2 19 1.9 Taunton
Total 93 167 727 987 Total

x The figures at the heads of the columns indicate the number of assistants per shop.

Calls Over 30 6 - 30 Under 6
Total calls 987 93 167 727
100% 9.5% 16.9% 73.6%

It will be seen from Table 1 (a) that there is a close correlation for every region between the dispersion of calls in small shops, and dispersion of all calls.

TABLE 1 (b)

Types of Shops

Department Multiple Private % All calls %
Glasgow 18 24 217 29 259 26.2 Glasgow
Liverpool 36 7 111 14.8 154 15.6 Liverpool
Sheffield 16 31 81 10.8 128 13.0 Sheffield
Nottingham 11 2 89 11.9 102 10.3 Nottingham
Wandsworth 2 48 52 7.0 102 10.3 Wandsworth
Wolverhampton 1 . 58 7.8 59 6.0 Wolverhampton
Norwich 9 9 33 4.4 51 5.2 Norwich
Paisley 3 7 32 4.3 42 4.2 Paisley
Warrington 5 1 35 4.7 41 4.1 Warrington
Torquay 3 4 23 3.1 30 3.0 Torquay
Taunton . 4 15 2.0 19 1.9 Taunton
Total 104 137 746 987
Calls Department Multiple Private
Calls 987 104 137 746
100% 10.5% 13.9% 75.6%

It will be seen that there is close correlation region by region of the dispersion of cells in private shops, and all cells.

Weighting .

Since the sampling factor varied for the areas covered, it was felt that a more correct picture would be given by basing weights upon the respective populations of the towns. This has been done.

The sample is not presented as a reflection of the rational picture. The areas selected for investigation were picked by a Board of Trade, and the total weighted figure is therefore a Summary only of the town investigated , and not a national figure.

14. 15.

THE WAR THE SOCIAL SURVEY

No. of Inquiry: New Series 1.

Investigation into Retailers’ Difficulties

NAME ... TOWN DATE

ADDRESS ...

Type of Shop. 30 & over... 6 - 30... 6 & under...
Department... Department...
Private... Private...
Multiple... Multiple...

1. When you present coupons to your wholesalers are they able or unable to give you goods in return?

2. For what kind of lines do you usually have to wait?

3. Have you had any of the new coupons presented to you yet from the new clothing cards?

4. Have any of your customers asked you questions about the new coupons yet?

4a. If yes, what questions are they asking?

5. Do your customers in general understand that 20 of these coupons can only be used after January next?

6. When your customers buy rationed goods do they:-

In the main bring their books for you to clip _____

In the main bring loose coupons _____

7. Do you think that in general customers prefer one rather than another Books _____ Loose coupons ______

8. If loose coupons what is the chief reason for this?

9. About what percentage bring loose coupons_____

10. Do you think that your customers would prefer to present loose coupons? Yes_____ No_____

What is the chief reason for this_____

11. Would you rather that they could? Yes_____ No_____

Why_____

12. About what percentage bring loose coupons to you_____ Comments made by Interviewee on Textile Rationing or difficulties arising out of it

Interviewer's comments.

Interviewer's signature...

For Office Use Only

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & Cookie Policy Accept & Close