A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46

1

THE DEFENCE MEDAL
CONTENTS

Page

  • Summery i

  • PART 1. PRELIMINARY REPORT (May, 1946)

    • 1. Problems arising from the decision to award a Defence Medal 1

    • 2. The announcement of the procedure for claiming a medal 1

    • 3. The conduct of the survey 2

    • 4. The number of people eligible 2

    • 5. Estimate of the probable number of claims (total) 3

    • 6. Estimate of the probable number of claims forwarded to different authorities 3

    • 7. Estimate of the number of supplementary claims 4

    • 8. The effectiveness of the publicity given to the Defence Medal 4

    • 9. Difficulties in completing the claim forms. 5

  • PART 2. SUPPLEMENTARY RESULTS (February)

    • 10. Preparation of a supplementary report 6

    • 11. Disinclination to apply 6

    • 12. Lack of certainty about eligibility 7

    • 13. Opinions on the popularity of the medal 7

    • 14. Conclusions to Part 2 8

  • PART 3. CRITICAL COMMENTS (June, 1947)

    • 15. Various estimates of the number of applications for the Defence Medal 10

    • 16. Possible sources of error in the sampling procedure 10

    • 17. Possible influence of administrative processes 13

    • 18. Possible source of error in the wording of the questions and in the design of the enquiry 13

  • APPENDICES

    • 1. Form D.M.1. 17

    • 2. Form D.M.2. 21

    • 3. Form D.M.3. 23

    • 4. Form D.M.4. 25

    • 5. Schedule used in the Defence Medal Survey (N.S. 78). 27

    • 6. Sampling instructions 29

    • 7. Interviewing instructions 31

    • 8. Answers to Question 8 35

We use cookies to track usage and preferences.

Privacy & Cookie Policy Accept & Close