A History of the Ministry of Information, 1939-46
Pooled coupons
A number of informants put some or all of their coupons into a family supply, or ‘pool’. This was defined as a collection of the family’s coupons used for any of its members. Where coupons were lent and repaid, but each person's supply kept separately, this was not counted as a pool.
Informants were asked whether they had put any of their coupons into a family pool and whether they had bought any garments for themselves from one (questions 11 or 12). It was found that it was impossible to get accurate information on the number of coupons put into and spent on informants out of family pools so this information was not asked for.
Many more men had contributed to a family pool than had used coupons from one, at the time of the interview.
Many more men with dependents used pools than men without dependents.
A very much smaller proportion of the women than of the men had contributed to a pool or spent coupons from one.
Coupons spent on other members of the informant's family and/or on household goods, where no coupons were pooled .
Those who did not contribute coupons to a family pool were asked whether any of their coupons had been spent on clothes for other members of their family and/or on household goods (question 13). The number of coupons spent in this way was recorded.
A member of the family was defined as a relation with whom the informant was living.
MEN | |||||||
Number of men | Yes | No | Don’t know | % saying yes | Number of coupons spent | % total coupons received * | |
Whole sample | 512 | 108 | 182 | 11 | 21 | 2,110 | 3.6 |
Occupation | |||||||
Non-manual | 104 | 18 | 37 | - | 17 | 355 | 3.0 |
Factory work | 95 | 18 | 36 | 2 | 19 | 332 | 3.0 |
Other manual work | 165 | 37 | 53 | 4 | 22 | 930 | 4.9 |
Miscellaneous | 61 | 18 | 19 | 2 | 30 | 259 | 3.7 |
Unoccupied | 87 | 17 | 37 | 3 | 20 | 234 | 2.4 |
Whether dependents | |||||||
Dependents | 456 | 102 | 137 | 10 | 22 | 2,011 | 3.8 |
No dependents | 56 | 6 | 45 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 1.2 |
Time since demobilisation | |||||||
Under 2 months | 172 | 34 | 74 | 5 | 20 | 526 | 2.7 |
2 and under 3 months | 136 | 28 | 42 | 1 | 21 | 543 | 3.5 |
3 months and over | 204 | 46 | 6 | 5 | 22 | 1,041 | 4.3 |
WOMEN | |||||||
Number of women | Yes | No | Don’t know | % saying yes | Number of coupons spent | % total coupons received | |
Whole sample | 245 | 109 | 99 | 9 | 45 | 2,000 | 4.7 |
Time since demobilisation | |||||||
Under 2 months | 35 | 12 | 20 | - | 34 | 142 | 2.1 |
2 and under 3 months | 58 | 23 | 27 | 3 | 40 | 445 | 4.5 |
3 months and over | 152 | 74 | 52 | 6 | 49 | 1,413 | 5.3 |
* As no information was obtained from two men as to the total number of coupons received in calculating these percentages it was assumed that they would have received the average number for their groups, e.g. there was no information for one unoccupied man. The average number of coupons received by unoccupied men was 9,681 ÷ 86 = 113 (see Table 1). 113 + 9,681 = 9,794. 234 is 2.4% of 9,794.
Coupons spent outside the informant's family
To complete the picture of expenditure all informants were asked whether they spent any of their coupons outside their own families (question 14) and the number of coupons spent in this way was recorded.
MEN | |||||||
Number of men | Yes | No | Not answered | % saying yes | Number of coupons given or lent | % total * coupons received | |
Whole sample | 512 | 40 | 453 | 19 | 8 | 667 | 1.1 |
Occupation | |||||||
Non-manual | 104 | 9 | 92 | 3 | 9 | 108 | .9 |
Factory work | 95 | 5 | 89 | 1 | 5 | 54 | .5 |
Other manual work | 165 | 14 | 143 | 8 | 8 | 264 | 1.4 |
Miscellaneous | 61 | 4 | 53 | 4 | 7 | 125 | 1.8 |
Unoccupied | 87 | 8 | 76 | 3 | 9 | 116 | 1.2 |
Whether dependents | |||||||
Dependents | 456 | 30 | 407 | 19 | 7 | 461 | .9 |
No dependents | 56 | 10 | 46 | - | 18 | 206 | 3.2 |
Time since demobilisation | |||||||
Under 2 months | 172 | 10 | 156 | 6 | 6 | 218 | 1.1 |
2 and under 3 months | 136 | 9 | 120 | 7 | 7 | 138 | .9 |
3 months and over | 204 | 21 | 177 | 6 | 10 | 311 | 1.3 |
WOMEN | |||||||
Number of women | Yes | No | Not answered | % saying yes | Number of coupons given or lent | % total coupons received | |
Whole sample | 245 | 45 | 194 | 6 | 18 | 529 | 1.3 |
Time since demobilisation | |||||||
Under 2 months | 35 | 6 | 29 | - | 17 | 59 | .9 |
2 and under 3 months | 58 | 10 | 46 | 2 | 17 | 123 | 1.2 |
3 months and over | 152 | 29 | 119 | 4 | 19 | 347 | 1.3 |
A smaller proportion of coupons was spent outside the informants' families that was spent on them. Those with no dependents spent a rather higher proportion of their coupons in this way than those with dependents.
The men and women spent about the same proportion of their coupons outside their families, although a higher proportion of women than of men had spent some coupons in this way.
Total expenditure of coupons on others
It is not possible to estimate exactly the total number of coupons spent by the informants on other people since the number of coupons that had been pooled by the informants and then spent on others is not known. The number of coupons excluding pooled coupons, that was spent by informants on their families and/or on household goods, and the number of coupons spent by informants on people outside their families, may be added to show the total number of coupons that the informants had spent on other people, apart from pooled coupons so spent.
About 5% of all the men’s coupons and 6% of the women’s were spent on other people, excluding pooled coupons. Men with and without dependents in all spent equal amounts of their coupons on other people, apart from coupons that were pooled.